12 Comments
User's avatar
Gabbie's avatar

i live for these analyses

Expand full comment
Chelsea Malkasian's avatar

Me too! They are interesting af

Expand full comment
Jordyn, M.S. OMS-0 | Podcaster's avatar

I love this analysis… it feels like economics but more feminine and I’m living for it. Trends and fashion are so interesting imo

Expand full comment
Katene's avatar

really interesting af

Expand full comment
Tina Boetto's avatar

Loved this analysis as always!

Expand full comment
BRUTISH's avatar

Genius. So good

Expand full comment
Rich's avatar

A great read - I’m really interested in how what we wear (not necessarily consume) can disrupt the ‘pre-set trend cycle trajectory’ set by the industry. Because it sure needs disrupting!

Expand full comment
Lauren's avatar

You should try to get data from NRF!

Also, wouldn’t mini skirts declining in volume be an indicator? I thought minis decline when There’s a recession. Can confirm we wore less of them.

There are some other things we can review which may or may not be relevant considering how much overall trends have changed for genderless dressing but here’s a few from when I lived through the Great Recession.

Ombré or grown out highlights - nobody can afford their double

Process color

At home nail kits / polish

Boyfriend / oversized fit for everything - jeans, t shirts, blazers, cardigans

In general slouchy fit - flowy tops, skirts, dresses, batwing cuts, slouchy suede boots.

T shirts layered under everything, even for work

We still wore heels but they had to have a platform for comfort, in general everything had to be more comfortable. Single sole stilettos started bouncing back in 2012/2013

Sheer clothing. Less fabric was cheaper lol

Lastly we dressed a lot more modestly than pre recession. The recession was not a time to

Show a lot of skin or wear flashy logos. Logo bags and jewelry declined in popularity.

Expand full comment
Gabbie's avatar

maybe it's because of my age at the time but 2008-2011 actually seemed like a VERY immodest time for clothes.... lots of skin, lots of neon/flashy clothes, lots of mini skirts and short shorts (with tights and the slouchy peter pan boots or pointy flats). the skinniest of skinny jeans. skintight everything. also the opposite of the "clean girl" aesthetic -- not saying a lot of makeup, but MESSY. in short, i totally understand why they decided to go with "indie sleaze" when retroactively naming that era's fashion.

Expand full comment
Lauren's avatar

Oh in comparison to today, you’re probably right! I’m comparing it to coming out of the 2000s when we basically wore lingerie, tanned ourselves into oblivion and used body glitter/ oil. Victoria’s Secret corset tops were going out tops. Side by side the short “trouser shorts”, blazers, crop tops and skinny jeans looked Amish to me lol. It obviously depends on the environment you were in too. Suits, and tights were really popular, the big wraps that covered your entire torso lol. We still wore a cocktail dress on the weekends, but generally it was much more classy than the bandage dresses I wore in college. Yes we did wear a smoky eye for sure, that was our “edge” despite the mad men/gossip girl aesthetic. But that could be my environment, I lived in New York and worked in fashion. And I have loved it all, no regrets!

Expand full comment
Gabbie's avatar

oh for sure, also depends on the scene of course! i was in a college in the early/mid aughts that was half and half granola/hipster, so nary a bandage dress in sight lol, but i definitely know exactly what you're talking about. i'll never forget the wearing blazers to the club thing though... that seemed like a cross-cultural phenomenon somehow

Expand full comment
Lauren's avatar

Blazers for everyone! My favorite jacket was a fancy military jacket with tails lmao

Expand full comment